The 5D Mark III has a resolution of 22.1 megapixels, whereas the 6D Mark II.
Both are DSLR (Digital Single Lens Reflex) cameras that are equipped with a full frame sensor. Sony A7rIV,, Tamron 28-200mm, Sigma 40mm f1.4 Art FE, Sony 85mm f1.8 FE, Sigma 105mm f1.4 Art FEįuji GFX50s, 23mm f4, 32-64mm, 45mm f2.8, 110mm f2, 120mm f4 macroĬanon 24mm TSE-II, 85mm f1.2 L II, 90mm TSE-II Macro, 300mm f2. The Canon EOS 5D Mark III and the Canon EOS 6D Mark II are two digital cameras that were announced, respectively, in March 2012 and June 2017. But even here you talking close to $2900. So if 5dmk2 was like $1000 then I agree pick 5dmk2 but with what they selling 6d for, I would pick 6d. I love the 80D and Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 DC HSM Art Lens c. Again if it were me I would go for the 80D over the 6D Mk II. This might not be a factor for you but it would be for me.
The 6D line is an entry level series but the 5D line is pro level.
Here used 5dmk will sell for like $1300-$1400 while you can get brand new 6d for $1300. wrote: IMHO, I would go for a 5D Mk III every time. Or you can get a quality ND filter, and make stunning long exposure shots, at daylight - without that filter, no matter wich camera is better, you can't make these shots. Now its nice that the 6D has better HIGH ISO performance, but without that Tripod, it does not really matter, because you won't shoot night pictures at 1/20sec, but at 30s, and for that you NEED a tripod, or something that holds your camera. Its the photograper, and his (rest) gear that makes that difference.įor example, for that $500 you could get a nice tripod, and use it to make nice night shots. In all honesty, comparing camera specs side by side does not make that much difference. The question is: Is the 6D that much better for your needs, that is it worth the $500 extra, or can you get something for the 5D Mk II for $500, that makes it a better deal. Now if you can't afford the 5D Mk III, and looking at the prizes, the 5D Mk II should be around $2100, and the 6D around $2600. If you really want to feel like upgrading, then the 5D Mk III is the only way to go, it is the only (not 1 Series) camera realy superior to the 7D.
They unveiled quite possibly the most anticipated release of 2012 in the 5D Mark 3 and, just in time for. If you are coming from a 7D tough, the AF system of both these cameras is worse then that of the 7D.ĪND THAT could make you being disappointed. Answer: The 5D MkII is quite an old camera, and although it was considered a standard for DSLR filmmakers because of its full-frame sensor and ability to use Canon’s best lenses, the crop sensor 7D was also quite popular. Canon, like Nikon have had a busy year with regards to their full frame camera releases. The 6D is a good camera for sure, but (as my friend also said) its not that better, that its wort to "upgrade".
My 5D Mk II makes me perfectly happy, the only thing I would upgrade to is the MK III. Sure the 24-70 is newer, more recent technology, but is it really better?!